ANZ Finance Spend Management and Automation Glossary (A

A

Accounts Payable (AP): The function responsible for processing supplier invoices and outgoing payments. AP ensures vendor bills are received, verified, approved, and paid on time. Efficient AP management is crucial to avoid late fees and duplicate payments, which can leak cash. Traditional AP is often manual and error-prone, but automation can cut invoice processing time by over 60% and catch errors like duplicate invoices before they cost you.
Accruals (Accrued Expenses): Expenses that have been incurred but not yet paid. In accrual accounting, companies recognise expenses in the period they occur rather than when the cash is paid. For example, an accrual is recorded for a service received in March even if the invoice is paid in April. This ensures financial statements reflect the true expenses of each period and prevents month-end close surprises by accounting for unpaid invoices.
Approvals (Approval Workflow): A structured process to review and authorise spending (e.g. invoices, expense claims, purchase requests) before money leaves the business. Multi-level approval workflows assign approvers based on role or amount thresholds (often called a Delegation of Authority matrix). Strong approval controls enforce company spend policies –so that no more invisible approvals are hiding in emails. Automated approval workflows can route requests to the right managers and log every approval decision for an audit trail.
Audit Trail: A chronological record of all actions and approvals related to a transaction. In spend management, an audit trail shows who requested, approved, and modified each expense or payment, providing full traceability “from the inbox to the GL (General Ledger)”. Audit trails are essential for compliance and audits, ensuring every invoice or expense is fully traceable and any anomalies can be investigated. Robust spend platforms help log each step for a transaction so nothing falls through the cracks.
Artificial Intelligence (AI in Finance): The use of AI and machine learning to automate and improve financial processes. In spend management, AI powers features like invoice data extraction and fraud detection. For instance, AI-based OCR can auto-code invoices, and anomaly detection can flag unusual expenses and detect invoice fraud. Finance leaders appreciate AI’s efficiency but AI recommendations must be explainable and overrideable (a “human-in-the-loop” approach). When done right, AI speeds up tasks (like auto-matching invoices) while alerting humans to potential issues (like out-of-policy spend).

B

Bank Feeds: Automated bank or card transaction feeds that import financial data into a system. In spend management, bank feeds typically refer to corporate credit card feeds – daily transaction data from card providers flows into the expense platform. This automation means employees don’t have to manually input card transactions; instead, expenses are auto-created with date, amount, and merchant info. Bank feeds ensure all spend is capturedmatched with receipts, improving accuracy and reducing month-end workload.
Budget (Budget Management): A financial plan that allocates spending limits across departments, projects, or categories. Budgets set expectations for spend and are used to control costs. In a spend management platform such as ProSpend, budgets are often built-in so that as employees raise POs or submit expenses, the system checks against the available budget. This real-time budget visibility flags any overspend before it happens, helping companies stick to their plans and avoid unplanned spend. Proactive budget management also means comparing actual spend to the budget (e.g. Year-to-Date vs. plan) to identify variances early.
Business Central Integration: Connecting a spend management system with Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central (a popular mid-market ERP). Such an integration syncs data (eg. vendors, demensions and jobs) and automates entries of approved expenses and invoices into Business Central. This eliminates duplicate data entry and errors. ProSpend offers direct integrations to 30+ ERPs including Business Central. A seamless Business Central integration means AP data flows from the spend platform to the ERP ledger automatically, maintaining a single source of truth for financials.
Business Spend Management (BSM): A broad term referring to the unified management of all business spending. It encompasses procurement, accounts payable, expenses, travel, and budgets in one approach. The goal of BSM is to give companies a single source of truth for all spend and to control leakage by consolidating processes. Leading unified spend management platforms bring together AP, expense management, corporate cards, and more in one workflow. By contrast, using disparate tools for each area can create blind spots and inefficiencies. Business Spend Management emphasises visibility, policy compliance, and strategic control over company-wide expenditures.

C

Compliance (Policy Compliance): Adhering to internal spend policies and external regulations in all finance processes. For example, a company might have a travel policy (limits on flights or hotels) or an expense policy (requiring receipts for claims). Ensuring compliance means the system enforces these rules – flagging or blocking out-of-policy spend. Compliance also extends to tax and legal regulations (e.g. following GST and FBT rules, or ensuring audit requirements are met). Strong spend management tools have built-in policy checks, approval controls, and audit trails to automatically enforce compliance, which 97% of finance leaders say is a struggle without robust controls.
Corporate Cards: Company-issued credit cards used by employees for business expenses (travel, office supplies, etc.). Corporate cards simplify purchasing by removing the need for personal reimbursements, but they require oversight. Common challenges include ensuring employees submit receipts and preventing misuse or rogue spend. A spend management platform typically integrates corporate card feeds (transactions download daily)and can auto-match receipts, categorise expenses, and enforce spend limits. Modern solutions also offer Virtual Debit Cards (digital card numbers) alongside physical corporate cards, letting companies instantly issue cards with pre-set limits and automatically capture each transaction. Proper corporate card management gives real-time visibility into card spend and reduces out-of-pocket spending by employees.
Cost Center Tracking: Organising expenses by cost centers – which are departments, locations, projects or any unit of the business responsible for costs. Each expense or invoice can be tagged to a cost center so that spend can be tracked against the budget for that unit. For example, an invoice might be assigned to “Cost Center 100 – Marketing.” Cost center tracking is important for reporting and accountability: managers see the total spend for their area, and finance can produce departmental P&L statements. Good spend management platforms such as ProSpend auto-code transactions with the appropriate cost center (often based on who submitted it or which project it’s for. This saves time versus manually allocating costs in spreadsheets. It also supports multi-entity and multi-department visibility, so each manager knows where they stand against their budget.
Cost Control: The practice of reducing or optimising costs to improve profitability. For CFOs, cost control is a top priority – 75% of CFOs in Australia cite cost control as a major focus. In spend management, cost control involves eliminating wasteful or unnecessary spend (sometimes called spend leakage) while ensuring essential expenses are approved and efficient. Tactics include enforcing budgets and policies (to prevent unapproved spend), negotiating better vendor terms, avoiding duplicate payments and late fees, and analysing spend data for savings opportunities. Effective cost control turns indiscriminate cuts into strategic optimisations – e.g. using accounts payable software such as ProSpend to flag duplicates and avoid paying the same invoice twice or incurring avoidable fees. Controlling cost before it happens (through approvals and POs) is safer than cutting after the money is spent.

D

Days Payable Outstanding (DPO): A key AP metric measuring the average number of days a company takes to pay its suppliers. A higher DPO means the company is taking longer to pay invoices (which can conserve cash and improve working capital, but if too high might strain supplier relationships). A lower DPO means quicker payments (good for supplier goodwill or capturing discounts, but uses cash faster). Companies aim to optimise DPO – for instance, by paying on time per agreed terms (e.g. Net 30). Automating AP can help manage DPO by ensuring invoices are approved in time to either pay on the due date or to take advantage of any early payment discounts. CFOs monitor DPO as part of cash flow strategy; changes in DPO impact liquidity and may reflect negotiation of better payment terms or improved AP efficiency.
Data Entry Automation: Using software (like OCR and integrated systems) to eliminate manual typing of financial data. Traditional AP clerks might re-key invoice details from paper into an ERP, which is slow and error-prone. Data entry automation means invoices, receipts, and other documents are digitised and coded automatically – e.g. scanning an invoice and letting the system capture vendor, date, amounts, etc. Modern AP platforms use AI-driven OCR to achieve this, so invoices are entered once – no manual typing ever again. Reducing manual data entry not only saves time but also improves accuracy and frees finance staff for higher-value work. It also speeds up downstream processes since data flows digitally instead of being stuck in paperwork.
Delegation of Authority (DoA): A framework that defines who in the organisation can approve what level of spend. It’s essentially the approval authority matrix. For example, managers might approve expenses up to $1,000, directors up to $5,000, CFO for anything higher. A clear DoA prevents junior staff from authorising large or sensitive expenditures and ensures proper oversight. In spend management systems, the DoA is configured as part of the approval workflow – the system routes requests to the appropriate approver based on amount, department, or category. This enforces compliance with company policy (no one exceeds their limit) and provides an audit trail of approvals. It also aligns accountability: bigger decisions require higher-level sign-off. Automating the DoA matrix means approvers are assigned instantly and consistently for each transaction, avoiding confusion or bypassing of controls.
Duplicate Payments: Paying the same invoice twice, often due to human error or lack of visibility, resulting in unnecessary loss of cash. Duplicate payments are a form of spend leakage that diligent AP management aims to eliminate. They can occur when an invoice is accidentally entered twice under slightly different references, or when manual processes fail to catch a duplicate vendor bill. This is a surprisingly common issue in manual AP – one study found as much as 0.1-0.5% of payments in large companies are duplicates. Modern AP software includes duplicate invoice detection to tackle this. For example, ProSpend automatically scans all invoices and compares details to flag potential duplicates. By detecting duplicate invoices before payment, companies can avoid overpayments. Stopping duplicate payments protects cash flow and saves the effort of recovering funds from suppliers later.
Dynamic Discounting: A practice where buyers and suppliers use a sliding scale to negotiate early payment discounts on invoices. Unlike standard early payment terms (e.g. 2% discount if paid in 10 days), dynamic discounting typically occurs via a platform that lets a buyer choose to pay a supplier earlier than due in exchange for a certain discount, which might vary based on how early the payment is. For instance, a supplier might accept a slightly smaller discount if paid 5 days early versus a larger discount for 20 days early. This can benefit buyers by earning a higher return on cash (the discount effectively is like risk-free interest) and benefit suppliers by improving their cash flow when needed. Spend management and AP automation systems sometimes facilitate dynamic discounting by providing portals or payment platforms for such arrangements. It requires visibility into approved invoices and available cash. Companies with strong cash positions may leverage dynamic discounting to reduce costs (capturing discounts) while suppliers get paid faster – a win-win supported by automation and transparency of invoice status.

E

e-Invoicing (Electronic Invoicing): The exchange of invoice information in an electronic, standardised format between supplier and buyer systems. True e-invoices are not PDFs or scans, but data files (often XML or EDI) that can be automatically ingested by the AP system with no manual entry. Many countries are adopting e-invoicing standards (like PEPPOL in Europe/Australia). With e-invoicing, a vendor’s system generates an invoice that goes straight into the customer’s AP software for approval, eliminating paper and email. This speeds up processing and reduces errors. ProSpend supports e-Invoicing to achieve digital transformation of AP processing. Companies using e-invoicing report faster approval cycles and easier compliance (since tax data is captured accurately).
ERP Integration: Connecting a spend management platform with an ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) system or accounting software so data flows seamlessly between them. ERP integration is critical so that approved invoices, expenses, POs, etc., automatically update the company’s financial ledgers without manual data re-entry. A smooth integration means the spend system sits on top of your ERP, not replacing it. Benefits include: no duplicate entry (saving time, reducing errors), consistent vendor and GL data across systems, and real-time posting of transactions.

ProSpend provides integrations to 30+ leading ERPs in the region using APIs to connect effortlessly to your existing ERP”. Strong ERP integration addresses a common CFO objection: “We already have an ERP – why do we need another system?” The answer is that the spend platform adds automation and controls while feeding results into the ERP, combining each system’s strength.
Expense Categorisation: Classifications for different types of expenses (also known as GL expense accounts or spend categories). Examples include Travel, Meals, Office Supplies, Software, etc. categorising expenses is important for budgeting, reporting, and tax treatment. For instance, meal and entertainment expenses might need special tracking for FBT, and software costs might be tracked separately from office supplies. In an expense management tool, each expense line is tagged with a category, often chosen by the user or automatically based on the merchant or receipt. Good systems allow custom expense categories tied to the company’s chart of accounts, so that when an employee selects “Hotel” or “Fuel,” it maps to the correct GL code. This ensures that when expense data flows to the ERP, it’s already coded correctly. Automation can also enforce category-specific rules (e.g. disallowing “Alcohol” category for certain staff or limiting “Gift” expenses). Proper use of expense categories results in more granular spend visibility – e.g. seeing total spend on Travel vs. Training – and easier compliance (like generating an FBT report filtered by entertainment categories).
Expenses (Employee Expenses): Money spent by employees for business purposes, typically out-of-pocket or on corporate cards, that needs to be reimbursed or accounted for. “Expenses” usually refers to Travel & Entertainment (T&E) expenses – things like meals, hotel, flights, mileage, client entertainment, office purchases, etc. Managing expenses involves employees submitting expense claims (with receipts and descriptions), managerial approval, and then either reimbursement to the employee or reconciliation of corporate card charges. This process can be rife with pain points: lost receipts, delayed approvals, policy violations, and potential fraud (e.g. falsified claims). It is also labor-intensive if done manually with spreadsheets or paper. A modern expense management solution automates this: employees can snap photos of receipts via mobile app, AI-powered OCR extracts details, and policy rules flag any out-of-policy spend for review. Managers approve digitally, and finance gets a unified report. This increases compliance and efficiency – for example, no reimbursing alcohol if policy forbids it, as the system would flag it. CFOs care about expenses because they can represent significant leakage if not controlled and out-of-policy expenses can add unnecessary spend. Integrated expense management systems like ProSpend also handle tax aspects like GST on receipts and FBT for entertainment. Managing employee expenses well means happier employees (fast reimbursement), fewer errors, and assurance that every dollar is justified and within policy.

F

Finance Automation: The use of technology to automate finance and accounting processes that were traditionally manual. This includes automating invoice processing, expense reporting, reconciliations, journal entries, and more. Finance automation aims to “do more with the same team” by increasing output per FTE through software rather than adding headcount. Examples of finance automation in practice: using OCR and AI to capture invoice data instead of typing it (reducing invoice processing time by 50% or more), automatically matching POs to invoices, auto-approving low-risk transactions, and scheduling batch payments. Automation improves accuracy (less human error) and frees finance staff from rote tasks to focus on analysis. However, CFOs implementing automation also seek clear ROI – e.g. cutting processing cost per invoice, or eliminating overtime – and guardrails to mitigate risks like undetected errors. When successful, finance automation can shorten the month-end close, prevent fraud, and give real-time visibility into finances.
Financial Controls (also called Spend Controls): Policies and mechanisms to ensure company funds are spent correctly, approved appropriately, and protected from misuse. Strong financial controls in spend management include things like enforced approval workflows, spend limits for each role, segregation of duties (e.g. the requester cannot also approve their own spend), and thorough documentation for each transaction. A lack of robust spend controls leaves businesses exposed – in fact, a majority of Australian finance leaders say they struggle with insufficient spend controls in their organisation.

Examples of controls: requiring a valid Purchase Order for any purchase over $5k (“No PO, no pay” policy), or automatically flagging any expense without a receipt as non-reimbursable. Proactive spend management systems such as ProSpend bake these controls into the process -you physically cannot pay an invoice unless it’s been approved per the matrix, for instance. Audit trails are also a key control, allowing after-the-fact review. The aim of financial controls is to catch errors or fraud before cash leaves the company and to ensure spend is aligned with company policies and budgets. When well-implemented, controls happen in the background and don’t unnecessarily slow down the business – they simply provide oversight and checkpoints to keep spending in check.
Fraud Control (Fraud Detection & Prevention): Measures and tools used to detect and prevent fraud in company spending. In AP and expenses, fraud could include fake or altered invoices, payments redirected to illegitimate accounts, or employees submitting false expenses. Fraud control is a high priority for CFOs – they worry that without robust controls, fraud or errors might slip through unnoticed.

Modern spend platforms such as ProSpend incorporate fraud control features such as: supplier verification, which cross-checks invoice bank account details against the authorised vendor master data; duplicate invoice detection (to prevent fraudulent double-billing); suspicious amount or pattern alerts (e.g. invoice amounts that are abnormally high compared to the average for that supplier); and enforce audit trails to deter internal fraud. ProSpend’s system, for example, performs multi-check processes on invoices using OCR and AI – verifying ABN validity, matching bank details, and comparing invoice values to typical ranges. If something doesn’t match (say a supplier’s bank info has unexpectedly changed), the platform flags it as a potential fraud risk. Effective fraud control gives confidence that every payment is going to legitimate suppliers for legitimate expenses. It protects cash flow and prevents costly mistakes or malicious losses. Fraud control is often discussed alongside spend controls and compliance as part of risk management in finance processes.
Fringe Benefits Tax (FBT): A tax levied on certain benefits that employers provide to employees (or their associates) in place of wages, particularly in countries like Australia. Examples of fringe benefits include company cars, free tickets to events, or expense payments for meals & entertainment. In Australia, FBT on meal entertainment is a significant component affecting business expenses. Companies can calculate FBT liability using either the 50/50 method (pay FBT on 50% of total entertainment expenses) or the Actual method (track actual employee vs. client portions of each expense). Managing FBT is important because if not tracked properly, businesses risk paying more tax than necessary or getting penalised for underpayment. A good expense system captures the necessary info for FBT – e.g. number of employees vs. clients attending a meal – and generate FBT reports. ProSpend, for instance, has a powerful FBT module that lets businesses manage FBT on entertainment spend using either method as prescribed by the ATO. It can produce on-demand FBT reports across any period, showing the tax calculated under Actual vs. 50/50 so companies can choose the lesser liability. Automating FBT tracking means that whenever an employee submits, say, a team dinner expense, the system prompts for attendees and allocates taxable value accordingly. This greatly simplifies the annual FBT return.

G

General Ledger (GL): The master accounting ledger where a company’s financial transactions are recorded, categorised by accounts. In spend management context, every expense or AP transaction ultimately hits the GL (e.g. an office supply purchase debits the “Office Supplies Expense” account in the GL). GL coding refers to assigning the correct account (and often department or project dimensions) to each transaction. One benefit of integrating spend software with the GL is automatic coding: as invoices and expenses are processed, they can be pre-coded to the right accounts based on predefined rules or mappings, and then synced to the GL. This saves the finance team from manually re-keying data into the accounting system. Maintaining the link between spend management and the GL ensures that financial reports (income statements, etc.) are up-to-date and accurate. Additionally, the GL is where reconciliation happens – for instance, ensuring that the total of all approved invoices in the spend system matches the Accounts Payable balance in the GL. When a spend platform says “from the inbox to the GL,” it implies a seamless flow from initial receipt of an invoice to its final recorded state in the general ledger, with an audit trail attached.
Goods and Services Tax (GST): A value-added tax on most goods and services in many countries (10% in Australia). Businesses pay GST on purchases and charge GST on sales, and periodically remit the net difference to the tax authority. From a spend management perspective, proper GST tracking on expenses and supplier invoices is crucial so that the business can claim GST credits on its purchases. For example, if an employee submits a receipt for a $110 purchase including $10 GST, the system should record $100 expense + $10 tax, enabling the company to reclaim that $10. Finance software often includes a GST or VAT “wizard” or settings to automatically apply the correct tax rates to expenses and invoices. Non-compliant handling of GST can lead to missed credits or penalties. Automation reduces errors by ensuring every transaction has a tax code: e.g. “GST”, “GST Free”, “Input taxed”, etc., according to local rules. In Australia, companies also compile Business Activity Statements (BAS) from this data. A spend management platform that tracks GST on every transaction simplifies BAS preparation and ensures GST compliance. It can also handle exceptions like removing GST for certain items (e.g. for lost receipts beyond a certain amount, as ProSpend does automatically.
Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC): An umbrella term for the integrated approach an organisation takes toward corporate governance, risk management, and compliance with laws/policies. In finance and spend management, GRC involves implementing frameworks and tools to ensure spending decisions are made with proper oversight (governance), that financial risks (like fraud or budget overruns) are identified and mitigated, and that all regulatory and internal policy requirements are met (compliance). A spend management platform contributes to GRC by enforcing approval hierarchies (governance), embedding controls and alerts to catch anomalies or policy breaches (risk management), and keeping detailed records for audits and regulatory reporting (compliance). For instance, compliance features help with tax laws (GST/FBT reporting) and audit readiness, risk features might include fraud flags and spend analytics to detect outliers, and governance features ensure segregation of duties and management visibility of spend. CFOs and finance leaders increasingly seek solutions that strengthen GRC because weak controls can lead to financial misstatements or scandals.
Grant Management: For organisations (especially NFPs, educational or research institutions, and government-funded entities) that receive grants or restricted funding, grant management is the process of tracking spend against those specific funding sources to ensure compliance and proper use of funds. Each grant often comes with conditions on how money can be spent and requires reporting back to the funder. In spend management terms, this might involve setting up each grant or project as a unique budget or cost center, then tagging invoices and expenses to the correct grant. By doing so, the finance team can easily report how much of Grant X has been spent and on what. It also prevents commingling of funds (spending one grant’s money on another project by mistake). Automation helps enforce that only allowed expense categories are charged to a given grant and that no overspending occurs beyond the grant amount. For example, if a charity has a government grant for Training Programs, the system can flag if someone tries to charge unrelated expenses to that grant. Grant management through a spend system ensures organisations remain compliant with grantor requirements and are audit-ready – with every expense tied back to its funding source. It also helps in applying for future grants as it demonstrates accountability and transparency in fund usage.

H

Headcount Efficiency: The goal of increasing the amount of work each employee can handle, rather than hiring more staff, by leveraging better processes and tools. In finance, headcount efficiency is often improved through automation – for instance, handling double the invoice volume with the same AP team by eliminating manual tasks. CFOs under headcount pressure focus on output per FTE: increase output per finance employee instead of asking for more staff. Spend management software contributes to headcount efficiency by automating routine work (data entry, chasing approvals, compiling reports), so the finance team can manage growing volumes without burnout. For example, by deploying an AP automation tool, a company might process invoices 2-3 times faster, freeing staff to manage exceptions and analysis rather than paperwork. Headcount efficiency is crucial in mid-market firms that want to scale – the finance function should be able to support, say, double the transactions when the business doubles, without doubling the finance team.
Human Error: Mistakes made by people in the course of a process – in finance this often means typos, miskeyed amounts, overlooking a duplicate, coding something to the wrong account, etc. Human error is a leading cause of financial inaccuracies and process delays. For example, a tired AP clerk might type an invoice amount as $98,700 instead of $9,870, or approve a payment for the same invoice twice because records were not clear. These errors can cost money and take significant effort to correct. One of the key uses of spend management and AP automation is the reduction of human error. By automating data entry and calculations, the system ensures consistency and catches issues. Features like validation rules, OCR, and duplicate detection directly target human error: the software can validate that an invoice total matches the line items, or that a claimed expense date isn’t in the future, etc., which a human might miss. Additionally, enforced workflows mean nothing is paid without the proper checks. While humans will always be in the loop for judgement calls, removing tedious manual tasks greatly cuts down on the small errors that can accumulate into big problems.
Human-in-the-Loop (HITL): An approach to automation where human oversight is maintained, especially at critical decision points, rather than a “fully hands-off” AI. In spend management, HITL often refers to AI-driven processes like invoice coding or fraud detection that are supported by humans to ensure accuracy. For instance, during ProSpend’s invoice extraction, if the AI is unsure or an exception occurs, a human validator will review and correct the data. This combination achieves high accuracy while still benefiting from AI speed. CFOs value HITL models because they provide a safety net: the AI can do the heavy lifting, but a person can intervene where needed to prevent errors or explain decisions. An example of HITL: The system auto-codes 95% of invoices, but if an invoice layout is new or ambiguous, it’s flagged for a human to review and teach the system. HITL is essentially about keeping humans in control of automated processes, ensuring that AI doesn’t operate in a black box. This is important for accountability – e.g., an auditor might ask, “Why was this expense approved?” With HITL, the company can answer because a human ultimately made or confirmed the decision, guided by AI.
Hyperautomation: A strategy that involves automating as many processes as possible through the orchestrated use of multiple technologies like AI, machine learning, RPA (robotic process automation), and more. Hyperautomation goes beyond single-task automation; it looks at end-to-end processes and stacks of tools to achieve “automation of automation.” In finance, hyperautomation might mean integrating OCR, approval workflow, ERP integration, chatbot inquiries, and analytics, all working together with minimal human intervention. The goal is a virtually touchless process from start to finish, aside from oversight (the “human-in-the-loop” where needed). For example, a hyperautomated AP process could automatically receive an e-invoice, extract and validate the data, match it to a PO, route for any necessary approvals, post the entry to the ERP, and even initiate the payment – all without someone manually doing each step. ProSpend uses hyperautomation principles to ensure both machines and people work in harmony, where “the more you use it, the smarter it gets”. Hyperautomation in spend management can lead to dramatic efficiency gains and scalability, but companies must have robust controls in place (to avoid automating errors) and clear visibility.

I

Integrations (ERP & Accounting Systems): The connections that allow different software systems to work together by sharing data. In spend management, integrations usually refer to linking the spend platform with core finance systems like the ERP (e.g. SAP, Oracle, Dynamics) or accounting software (e.g. Xero, MYOB). Key data flows include pushing approved invoices and expense journals into the ERP, syncing vendor master data, pulling cost center or project lists, and updating payment status. A well-integrated system prevents the spend platform from becoming a silo; instead, it plays nice with existing tools so there’s one unified source of truth. For instance, when an invoice is approved in the spend system, an integration could automatically create the bill in Xero with all line items and tax codes correct – no manual re-keying. Integrations can be real-time via APIs or batch via file import/export, but the trend is toward seamless API integrations.

ProSpend offers out-of-the-box integrations to over 30 leading Australian ERPs, meaning mid-market companies can connect to common systems like MYOB Acumatica, NetSuite,Xero, Pronto, Sage, etc., with minimal IT effort. The result is that finance teams don’t have to duplicate work; they use the spend management tool for what it does best (approvals, data capture, etc.) and rely on the ERP for general ledger and financial reporting, with data flowing between. Strong integrations enable a single source of truth, reduce errors, and answer the “why do we need another system if we have an ERP?” – the integration makes the combination more powerful than either alone.

Invoice Capture (OCR): The process of digitising supplier invoices and extracting their data automatically. OCR (Optical Character Recognition) is the core technology that reads text from invoice images or PDFs. Modern invoice capture goes beyond basic OCR by using AI/ML to recognise invoice layouts and correctly identify fields (supplier, invoice number, date, line items, total, tax, etc.) without manual template setup. Good invoice capture solutions also validate the data – for example, checking that the numbers add up, or that the supplier name matches an existing vendor. The goal is an accurate, ready-to-approve digital invoice instead of a stack of paper or a PDF that someone must key in. ProSpend’s AI-powered invoice scanning “reads even the most complex formats” and extracts data with high accuracy. They also employ Human-in-the-Loop verification to guarantee accuracy on captured data.

Effective invoice capture greatly speeds up AP: invoices can be processed in minutes rather than days. It also enables touchless workflows (where an invoice might go straight through approval and into the ERP with no human data entry). Additionally, capturing line-item data (not just header totals) allows for detailed analysis of spend (what was bought, unit prices, etc.) and easier 3-way matching with POs.
Invoice Exception Handling: The process of managing invoices that cannot be straight-through processed due to some discrepancy or issue – an exception. Common exceptions include:

- Price or quantity mismatches with the PO (the invoice doesn’t match what was ordered/received)

- Missing or incorrect information (like an unknown supplier or an invalid purchase order number)

- Policy violations (invoice exceeds approval limits or lacks proper approval), or

- Duplicate/inconsistent data flagged by the system. When an exception occurs, the invoice is usually routed to an AP staff member or approver to review and resolve.
Effective exception handling workflows are crucial so that these invoices don’t get stuck and delay payments. A spend management system will often categorise exceptions (e.g. “PO mismatch – needs review by procurement” or “Policy violation – needs CFO approval”) and provide tools to resolve them.

For example, if an invoice is $100 higher than the PO, the system could alert the buyer to either accept the variance or dispute it with the vendor. The key is that exceptions are managed within the system – with clear visibility – rather than via ad-hoc emails or ignored until month-end. Reducing the rate of exceptions is also a goal: using 3-Way Matching and requiring PO references on invoices minimises exceptions. Nonetheless, exception handling capability is important for a complete AP solution, because not every invoice will match perfectly. Companies often measure exception rates as a KPI – world-class AP departments have a low percentage of invoices needing manual intervention. Automation can assist by catching issues early (upon capture) and even suggesting resolutions (e.g. auto-correcting a minor discrepancy within tolerance). Efficient invoice exception handling ensures that problematic invoices are resolved and paid without falling through the cracks, while maintaining controls and accuracy.

Invoice Processing: The end-to-end process of handling supplier invoices from receipt to payment. It includes capturing the invoice (opening mail or email and entering the data), validating it (ensuring the invoice is legit and details are correct), matching it to a purchase order or receiving documents if applicable, obtaining approvals if required, coding it to the right accounts, and scheduling the payment. Traditional invoice processing is heavily manual and paper-based, which makes it slow (the average manual processing time can be over a week per invoice and prone to errors or late payments. Automating invoice processing with a platform addresses these pain points: invoices can be ingested via email or portal, then automatically captured, matched and routed for approval. Touchless invoice process occurs when a PO-backed invoice matches exactly – the system can auto-approve and queue it for payment without human involvement. For non-PO or mismatched invoices, the system sends them through an approval workflow. Modern systems also incorporate fraud checks (verifying supplier details) and compliance checks (e.g. tax calculations) during processing. The outcome of invoice processing is that the invoice is either approved and ready to be paid (and recorded in the ERP), or it is rejected/disputed.

Efficient invoice processing is vital for maintaining good supplier relationships (through on-time payments), avoiding late payment fees, and taking advantage of any early payment discounts. It also frees up the AP team’s time by cutting processing time per invoice from days to minutes; they can handle higher volumes without a backlog.

J

Journal Entries: Accounting entries recorded in the general ledger, consisting of debits and credits to specific accounts. In spend management, many transactions ultimately become journal entries – for instance, when an AP invoice is approved, a journal entry is made debiting the expense account and crediting accounts payable (and possibly GST input credit accounts). Traditionally, accountants would prepare journal entries for batches of expenses or accruals, especially at month-end (e.g. accruing for invoices not yet received). With integrated spend management, a lot of journal posting can be automated: each invoice or expense, once approved, generates a journal entry in the ERP with all the proper accounts. This ensures real-time financial updates and reduces manual journal creation. However, some journals still might be needed for adjustments (like reallocating a cost or correcting an entry). Modern systems can assist by providing templates or suggestions for those as well. By minimising manual journals, companies reduce errors – since manual journal entry is a common source of mistakes in the close process. Also, automated journals mean the finance team doesn’t spend as much time on low-level bookkeeping and can focus on review and analysis. When evaluating spend management impact, one KPI is often the reduction in manual journal entries needed at period-end, since more expenses are accounted for correctly during the process. Ultimately, journal entries are where the spend gets reflected in the official books, so having a seamless handoff or integration from spend platform to GL (as discussed in ERP Integration) is critical. When the CFO asks for the total travel expense this quarter, the GL is already up to date thanks to entries from the expense system without needing a bunch of post-closing adjustments.
Just-in-Time Payments: A payment strategy of scheduling payments to suppliers as close as possible to the due date (or when needed) rather than well in advance. The idea is to optimise cash flow by holding onto cash until the last responsible moment, but not late. In practice, this might mean if a vendor invoice is due in 30 days, the AP system schedules it for payment on day 30 exactly (or slightly before if needed to clear). With modern electronic payments, companies can often achieve very precise timing. Just-in-time payments keep DPO at the desired level and ensure the company maximises use of its cash on hand (perhaps earning interest or simply preserving liquidity) while still maintaining good supplier relationships (by paying on time). Some suppliers offer discounts for early payment, in which case a company will weigh the benefit of that discount against the value of holding cash longer (see Dynamic Discounting). Implementing just-in-time requires a well-organised AP process: invoices must be processed promptly and scheduled appropriately. Automation is a big enabler – the system can be set to automatically execute payments on their due dates, removing the risk of human forgetfulness or batching delays. It also ties into forecasting: finance can better predict cash needs if payments are timed predictably.
Justification (Business Justification): The explanation or reason provided for a spend request or expense. Many companies require that significant expenses come with a justification – essentially answering “Why are we spending this money?” For example, an employee filing an expense report for a client dinner might need to include a note about who was entertained and the business purpose of the dinner. Or a department requesting a new software purchase might attach a business case document. Capturing justification is important to ensure that every spend aligns with business objectives and to provide context for approvers (and auditors). In spend management systems, there’s often a field for comments or justification on purchase requisitions, invoices (especially if they’re exceptions or non-PO invoices), and expense claims. Approvers then review this alongside the amount and details when deciding whether to approve. Business justification helps prevent “rubber stamp” approvals by forcing requesters to articulate the need or benefit of the spend. It also helps after the fact – if someone questions an expense later, the justification is logged in the system. For instance, a manager might later ask “What was this $5,000 marketing expense for?” and the system notes might read “Booth fee for industry conference X to generate leads.” Some organisations formalise this especially for capex or large OPEX items, requiring a detailed justification or even ROI calculation. In terms of employee compliance, requiring a justification for each expense line (even a brief note like “Client meeting with ABC Corp on 5/10”) can significantly improve transparency. It’s also a deterrent against frivolous or fraudulent spend – if an employee can’t come up with a valid reason, they likely shouldn’t claim it.

K

Kaizen (Continuous Improvement): A philosophy of continuous, incremental improvement originally from Japanese manufacturing, but applicable to finance processes as well. Kaizen in spend management might involve regularly analysing the AP and expense workflows to find small ways to reduce waste (time, errors, cost). For example, a finance team might hold a monthly review of their invoice process and discover that adding a new rule in the system (like auto-approving invoices under $50) could save approvers time without increasing risk. Or they might tweak expense policy based on frequent exceptions to streamline things.

The key Kaizen mindset is that processes can always be improved and employees at all levels should suggest and implement enhancements. In many modern finance teams, this is embodied by actively using analytics and feedback: e.g., noticing that the marketing department consistently submits late expense reports and then conducting a training or adjusting the deadline.
In the context of spend management software, vendors often iterate with new features or the finance team might refine configurations (like adding a new duplicate-check rule) over time. Kaizen is essentially a culture: encouraging the finance/AP team not to accept “that’s just how it is” but to constantly seek better ways, whether it’s reducing errors, speeding up the month-end close, or negotiating better with suppliers. The result is a more agile, efficient finance operation that adapts and improves continuously.

Key Performance Indicators (KPIs): Quantifiable metrics used to gauge the performance and efficiency of finance processes. In spend management and AP, typical KPIs include:
Cost per Invoice Processed (e.g., dollars spent to process each invoice, which can drop significantly with automation,
Cycle Time (how many days from invoice receipt to payment or from expense submission to reimbursement),
Approvals Cycle Time (average time approvers take to approve),
First-Time Match Rate (percentage of invoices that match POs without intervention),
Exception Rate (percentage of invoices that hit exceptions)
On-Time Payment Rate (what percent of payments were made by the due date),
Expense Policy Compliance Rate (share of expense reports that fully comply without adjustments),
Employee Reimbursement Time (how quickly employees get paid back).

CFOs and AP managers monitor these KPIs to identify areas for improvement and to measure the impact of process changes or new systems.In preparing a business case for a spend management solution, KPIs are often projected and later tracked to ensure ROI. KPIs are essential to making the finance function data-driven. They turn nebulous goals like “be faster” or “be efficient” into specific targets and numbers that can be improved and celebrated when achieved.

Know Your Supplier (KYS): Borrowing from the concept of Know Your Customer (KYC) in banking, KYS refers to the due diligence process of verifying and understanding your vendors to prevent fraud and ensure compliance. In spend management, KYS can involve confirming a supplier’s legitimacy (checking business registration numbers like ABNs, verifying bank account ownership, ensuring they’re not on sanction lists), as well as assessing their reliability and risk. One practical application of KYS is bank account verification on invoices – ensuring the account number on an invoice is indeed associated with that supplier, not changed by a fraudster (which is a growing scam). AP automation tools such as ProSpend integrate bank validation services or require a secondary verification when a supplier’s bank details change, effectively “knowing” that the payee is correct. KYS also might cover collecting and storing supplier documentation like tax IDs, insurance certificates, or ESG compliance info. It’s about having a strong supplier master data management. By knowing your supplier, you reduce risk of paying illegitimate or fraudulent entities and you maintain compliance (e.g. ensuring a contractor isn’t actually an undeclared employee, or that a supplier is not a blacklisted entity). The concept ties into supplier onboarding in a spend system – typically, there’s a vetting workflow when adding a new vendor. ProSpend, for instance, leverages an integrated supplier database to maintain a single source of truth for supplier details. This can include verification steps. CFOs appreciate KYS processes as part of fraud control and robust procurement governance. It’s another layer of defense: not only controlling internal spend decisions, but also validating the external parties you’re paying. KYS ultimately safeguards the company against fraud, fines (imagine paying the wrong entity), and reputational damage by ensuring you “know who you’re doing business with” in every sense.

L

Late Payment Fees: Penalties charged by suppliers when invoices are not paid by the agreed due date. These fees can accumulate and hurt the bottom line – they’re essentially a waste of money resulting from process inefficiency or poor cash management. For example, a vendor might impose a 2% monthly charge on overdue balances. CFOs are keen to eliminate late payment fees; doing so is often cited as an ROI area for AP automation. Reasons invoices go late can include lost paperwork, lengthy approval cycles, or simply missing the due date in manual systems. By streamlining invoice processing and having proactive alerts for upcoming due dates, a spend management platform helps ensure payments are made on time (or that the team negotiates extensions if needed).With better cash flow visibility, finance can plan to have funds available for obligations. The benefits of avoiding late fees go beyond the fee itself: it also maintains good supplier relationships and avoids any supply disruptions that could happen if a vendor puts a hold on your account for non-payment.
Liquidity (Cash Flow Management): The ability of a company to meet its short-term obligations using its cash and assets readily convertible to cash. In simpler terms, liquidity is about having enough cash on hand (or quickly obtainable) to pay the bills. Spend management impacts liquidity directly – every payment decision affects cash outflow timing. Good spend management and AP practices help optimise liquidity by controlling when cash leaves the company. For example, implementing just-in-time payments keeps cash in the company’s account until exactly needed, improving liquidity. Poor processes (like late approvals causing missed payment cycles) might force earlier-than-ideal payments or incur interest, which can hurt cash positions. CFOs keep a close eye on cash flow forecasts, and one key input is the AP pipeline (all the approved but unpaid and pending invoices). A spend management system gives real-time visibility into accrued liabilities and upcoming payments, which improves cash planning. It can also facilitate tactics like Payment Scheduling or Dynamic Discounting to manage liquidity – either extending payables to hold cash longer (within agreed terms) or strategically paying early to save money if cash allows.

Metrics like the Quick Ratio or current ratio are measures of liquidity; an efficient AP process can improve these by ensuring current liabilities (like payables) are managed in line with current assets (like cash and receivables). Additionally, avoiding late payment fees and taking early payment discounts both positively impact cash flow (eliminating unnecessary outflows or capturing savings). In summary, liquidity management is about balancing outflows with inflows. Spend management contributes by timing those outflows smartly and by providing clarity – knowing at any given time “how much do we owe and when” is crucial. Companies with tight liquidity especially benefit from the discipline and precision that automation provides (e.g., you can confidently pay on the last day without fear of something slipping through).

Lost Receipts: Receipts that have gone missing or were never obtained for expense claims. This is a common issue in expense management – an employee loses a taxi receipt or forgets to get a receipt for a small purchase, making it difficult to substantiate the expense. Lost receipts create compliance and tax challenges: for instance, in Australia, if you don’t have a valid tax invoice for a GST claim over a certain amount, you technically shouldn’t claim the GST credit (some companies then disallow the expense or treat it as GST-inclusive). They also complicate FBT calculations for entertainment expenses, as missing receipts mean missing details on attendees or amounts. Many companies have policies (like requiring a missing receipt affidavit or manager approval) to handle lost receipts. A modern spend management system such as ProSpend can mitigate this issue in a few ways: by encouraging real-time capture (mobile apps to snap a photo of the receipt right when the expense is incurred, greatly reducing loss), by integrating digital receipts (for example, pulling e-receipts from travel bookings or using email-forward for receipts), and by handling the compliance automatically. ProSpend’s system can automatically remove the GST from a claim if the receipt is marked as lost beyond allowed limits – this ensures compliance with ATO rules without manual intervention.

The system might also prompt users to provide a description or alternate proof if a receipt is lost. Lost receipts, while often a small fraction of total transactions, consume outsized administrative time (chasing employees for documentation) and can lead to compliance risks. Therefore, eliminating lost receipts through easier capture and cloud storage is a big win. Storing receipt images in a central database means they can’t fade or get lost in a shoebox – they’re attached to each transaction record. So when audit time comes, finance isn’t desperately hunting for that one missing hotel receipt from nine months ago. Minimising lost receipts is part of good expense management hygiene, and technology has made it much easier: scan it, save it, and it’s always there when needed.

M

Maverick Spend (Rogue Spend): Purchases made outside of approved channels or policies, often by employees or departments bypassing the formal process. It’s termed “maverick” or “cowboy” spend because it’s uncontrolled and doesn’t follow the rules. Examples include a manager buying equipment without a Purchase Order because it seemed faster, or a team signing up for a software subscription without procurement’s knowledge. Maverick spend is problematic as it can lead to higher costs (no negotiated supplier rates), compliance issues, and difficulty tracking total company spend. The goal of spend management is to rein in maverick spend by providing easy-to-use systems that encourage compliance (if it’s easier to do it the right way, employees will) and by enforcing policies (for example, requiring a PO for any purchase over a threshold or blocking reimbursements that violate policy).

Purchase Order systems are a common solution: if an employee can raise a PO in minutes and get approval, they’re less likely to circumvent the process. Also, Corporate Cards with clear category controls can channel spend into authorised routes. Maverick spend often thrives when processes are so cumbersome that well-intentioned staff bypass them to get the job done. Making the spend process user-friendly is key to reducing rogue purchases. Analytics can help identify maverick spend by flagging spend with unapproved vendors or spend that should have had a PO but didn’t. Reducing maverick spend improves spend visibility (no blind spots), helps with cost savings (leveraging preferred suppliers and volume pricing), and ensures compliance (no surprise contracts or unvetted vendors).
Month-End Close (Financial Close): The process finance teams undertake at the end of each month to finalise the accounting records for that period. It involves reconciling accounts, posting any remaining accruals or adjustments, and ensuring that all expenses and revenues are recorded in the correct month. Month-end close can be a hectic time, especially if invoices or expense reports are still trickling in for the period that’s ending. One aim of spend management automation is to shorten and smooth out the month-end close. By capturing and approving transactions in real-time throughout the month, there are fewer surprises or backlogs at month-end (like a stack of unprocessed invoices). For example, having live budgets built into every transaction means teams are not waiting until month-end to see if something was over budget – they catch it when the spend is requested. Also, features like automated accruals can accrue for any expenses incurred but not fully processed by month-end, reducing manual work. CFOs often measure the close in days – e.g. “we close the books in 5 business days.” Fast closes are advantageous because they provide timely visibility into monthly performance. A spend management platform helps by providing real-time or daily postings to the ERP (so the accounting ledger is mostly up-to-date by day 1 of the new month) and by offering complete audit trails (reducing time spent hunting for documentation at close). Additionally, it prevents month-end surprises by flagging overspends or unreceived POs early. Some systems also offer a “soft close” capability – generating preliminary reports even as stragglers come in – so finance can get a head start. A well-implemented spend management system turns the month-end close from a frantic catch-up exercise into a more routine wrap-up, since most transactions are already properly accounted for. This can cut days off the close and significantly reduce stress for the finance team, while improving the accuracy of financial statements.
Multi-Entity Management: Handling finances for multiple entities (such as subsidiaries, branches, or franchises) within one integrated system. Mid-market companies often have several entities for legal or business reasons (for example, a group with operations in two countries might have two subsidiaries). Multi-entity management in spend systems means the platform can segregate and consolidate spend data by entity, enforce entity-specific workflows, and integrate with multiple ERP instances if needed. ProSpend helps finance teams manage all entities in one place, allowing roll-up and drill-down across companies instantly. For AP, this could mean a central AP team processes invoices for all entities but each invoice is tagged to the correct entity’s books. Or, each entity’s managers can only approve spend for their entity. It also simplifies reporting – a group CFO can see total spend across the whole organisation, and also filter by entity.

Multi-entity capability usually involves handling different currencies and tax regimes too if entities are in different countries (for example one entity might use AUD and GST, another uses NZD and GST with different %). A robust system handles that behind the scenes. Without multi-entity support, companies resort to maintaining separate systems per entity or heavy spreadsheets to consolidate, which is inefficient and prone to error. A platform that is multi-entity aware dramatically streamlines group finance operations. It ensures consistency in processes (all entities follow the same spend policies, tailored as needed) and provides the single source of truth at both subsidiary and group level. Multi-entity management means that growth or reorganisation doesn’t add disproportionate complexity – the system scales with the corporate structure, keeping everything under one umbrella for easy governance and insight.
MYOB Integration: Connecting a spend management platform with MYOB - a popular accounting software suite in Australia/New Zealand. Many mid-market and growing small businesses use MYOB for general ledger, accounts, and payroll. A MYOB integration with ProSpend allows for seamless flow of data such as: pushing approved supplier invoices into MYOB for payment runs, syncing supplier master data between the systems, and syncing expense reimbursements into MYOB as bills. Given MYOB’s wide use, out-of-the-box integration is highly valuable. With a proper MYOB integration, a finance team can avoid manually re-entering data from one system to another (e.g., not having to type in each expense claim or supplier bill into MYOB). When something is final in ProSpend, it appears in MYOB with all details (supplier, date, account codes, GST amounts). The MYOB Acumatica integration also means the projects and subaccounts from MYOB can be synced into the spend system for accurate coding by users. This ensures that when transactions sync back, they hit the right accounts. For companies using MYOB, this integration is critical to achieve a single source of truth and to maintain efficiency.

N

Net Payment Terms: The agreed period a buyer has to pay a vendor’s invoice, often expressed as “Net X days.” For example, Net 30 means payment is due 30 days from the invoice date. Net terms are a fundamental part of supplier agreements and influence cash flow. Companies negotiate terms – longer terms (Net 60, Net 90) give buyers more breathing room (improving liquidity), while shorter terms benefit suppliers’ cash flow. In spend management, tracking and honoring net terms is crucial. The system should capture the due date based on the invoice date and stated terms, then help ensure invoices are approved and paid by that date. Good AP software highlights invoices nearing or past their due date so nothing slips (to avoid late payment fees). Some systems allow setting default terms per vendor so that even if an invoice doesn’t explicitly state it, the system knows, for example, this supplier is always Net 45. Occasionally, terms come with discounts (e.g. 2/10, Net 30 means 2% discount if paid in 10 days, otherwise due in 30) – managing that falls under Dynamic Discounting or just smart payment scheduling. Net terms also factor into working capital strategy: a CFO might push for extending average net terms (negotiating from Net 30 to Net 45) to better align cash outflows with inflows. However, the flipside is supplier relationships; paying consistently on agreed terms builds trust. In spend analytics, one might monitor average days to pay versus stated terms to ensure the company isn’t developing a habit of late payments or, conversely, paying too early. An automated system practically ensures that you pay on the exact net day if desired. Net payment terms set the timeline for AP obligations, and spend management processes revolve around meeting those timelines efficiently. Clear visibility of each invoice’s due date (which is invoice date + net terms) in the platform means finance can optimise payment timing – either exactly on due date (just-in-time) or earlier if beneficial. Understanding and leveraging net terms is a balancing act between maintaining goodwill with suppliers and maximising internal cash flow.
NetSuite Integration: Connecting a spend management platform with Oracle NetSuite, a leading cloud ERP system. NetSuite is used by many mid-market companies for finance (GL, AP, AR), so integration ensures that spend data (invoices and expenses) flows into NetSuite automatically. With a NetSuite integration, a system like ProSpend can create supplier bills in NetSuite once they’re approved, complete with coding and attachments. It might also sync vendors from NetSuite so that users of the spend system choose valid values. Given NetSuite’s robust API, integrations can often be real-time: e.g., as soon as an invoice is approved in ProSpend, it appears in NetSuite for the next payment run.This integrated setup means finance teams avoid duplicate data entry and potential inconsistencies between systems. A common scenario is that NetSuite remains the system of record for financials, but ProSpend acts as the feeder for all spend-related transactions, with its stronger UI/workflow for non-finance users and AP specialists. The CFO then can rely on NetSuite for reporting, confident that all data from ProSpend is represented. NetSuite integration also supports multi-entity if the company has multiple subsidiaries in NetSuite (for example, ProSpend can tag transactions by subsidiary so they post to the right books).
No-PO, No-Pay Policy: A procurement policy stating that if a purchase was made without an approved Purchase Order, the company will not pay the resulting invoice. This strict stance forces employees and suppliers to follow the proper process: the supplier should refuse an order without a PO number, and if an invoice comes in lacking a PO reference (and thus likely unauthorised), AP will reject it. The “No PO, No Pay” policy is a strong deterrent against maverick spend because it empowers AP to push back on unapproved purchases. Companies with this policy communicate clearly to all vendors that every invoice must quote a valid PO number, otherwise it won’t be honored. Internally, it trains employees that if they try to bypass the system, the invoice will boomerang and cause them headache (and potentially a stern talk from procurement). Implementing this policy successfully usually requires that generating a PO is not onerous – hence the need for a user-friendly PO system. With a good spend management platform like ProSpend, employees can raise a PO requisition online in minutes and get it approved electronically. The system will then match the invoice to that PO to streamline payment. If an invoice arrives without a PO, the system or AP team checks if it should have had one. Certain exceptions are allowed (like utilities or government fees might be PO-exempt). But generally, “No-PO, No-Pay” encourages compliance with procurement controls, thereby reducing rogue purchases and ensuring spend is pre-approved. It can significantly reduce the volume of unexpected invoices hitting AP. This policy is a blunt but effective instrument: it aligns with the principle “control spend before it happens” by essentially refusing to tidy up after uncontrolled spend. Companies adopting it often see a spike in PO compliance and a healthier, more predictable AP process.
Non-PO Invoice: An invoice that arrives from a supplier without an associated Purchase Order reference. This typically occurs when the purchase was not initiated with a PO. Non-PO invoices can present a challenge because the approval and validation process starts from scratch: AP has to figure out who ordered the goods or services and whether it was authorised. Examples of non-PO invoices include utilities, rent, legal fees, or other expenditures that companies might not manage via POs, or unfortunately, invoices resulting from maverick spend. Handling non-PO invoices is often less straightforward than PO-based ones, since there’s no pre-approval or expected amount to match against. A spend management platform will have a workflow for non-PO invoices: usually AP captures the invoice and then triggers a retrospective approval workflow, sending it to the person or department head responsible for that spend to approve or provide a coding. It’s essentially an “after-the-fact” approval.

This is where a lot of delay can happen in manual systems (invoices float around offices seeking someone to sign off). Automation makes it easier: for instance, the system might use the vendor name to suggest an approver or department (e.g., all invoices from Office Supplies Co. go to the Office Manager to approve if no PO). Some organisations try to minimise non-PO spend by expanding the PO policy (see No-PO, No-Pay). Still, some spend might practically be non-PO (like tax payments or certain subscriptions). It’s important that non-PO invoices go through equal rigor: they need to be approved by the right person and coded properly.

ProSpend can handle separate PO and non-PO workflows, including applying fraud checks and approval flows for each invoice type. The system can tag such an invoice as “Unbacked” or “Non-PO” so it gets extra scrutiny. Reporting can then show how much spend was non-PO vs. PO, often with a goal to reduce the non-PO portion over time for better control. Efficient handling of non-PO invoices is essential to avoid bottlenecks in AP and to ensure even unplanned spend is accounted for and authorised.

O

Optical Character Recognition (OCR): A technology that converts different types of documents (like scanned papers or images/PDFs of invoices and receipts) into machine-readable text data. OCR is the backbone of finance automation for capturing data from physical or PDF documents without manual typing. In spend management systems, OCR is used to read supplier invoices, receipts, and other documents. Modern OCR powered by AI technology can not only extract text but interpret it (figuring out which text string is the invoice total, which is the invoice date, etc.). This is how solutions achieve Invoice Capture. For example, when an AP clerk uploads or emails a PDF invoice into the system, OCR technology will identify the vendor name, invoice number, date, line items, amounts, GST, etc., and populate those fields in the digital form. It saves enormous time and reduces errors. OCR quality has improved such that even complex or unfamiliar formats can be handled with minimal training data. Some systems offer line-item OCR, meaning they capture each line of details (product, quantity, price) as opposed to just summary fields. OCR also plays a role in Expense Management: employees can snap a photo of a paper receipt, and OCR extracts the merchant, date, amount to pre-fill their expense claim. This alleviates the burden of input for the employee and ensures more accuracy (though employees may need to correct any misreads). OCR also appears in receipt matching: the system can scan a receipt using OCR and compare it to a card transaction to confirm details. While OCR is not foolproof on its own, when combined with machine learning and human verification (HITL) like with providers such as ProSpend, it guarantees extremely high accuracy. OCR in AP has been transformative: what used to be a clerical task of typing up invoices is now largely automated, shifting AP roles towards exception handling and vendor management. OCR is the eye of the finance automation system, seeing and reading documents so that the rest of the process can happen digitally. It is a core component that enables the elimination of paper from AP and expense processes.
Out-of-Policy Spend: Expenses or purchases that violate the company’s established spend policies. These are expenditures that fall outside the rules – for example: an employee flies business class when policy dictates economy, or a team exceeds the nightly hotel rate limit set in the travel policy, or someone buys software without required IT approval. Out-of-policy spend is a major source of spend leakage and risk, as it often indicates either non-compliance (intentional or accidental) or a gap in controls. Spend management systems can help catch out-of-policy spend in two ways: prevention and detection. On the preventive side, good systems enforce policy at the point of entry – e.g., if an employee tries to submit an expense above the allowed limit or of an unallowed type, the system can warn or block them.

On the detection side, any out-of-policy spend that does occur is flagged and routed differently – perhaps needing higher level approval or additional justification. For instance, an expense claim might show a red alert on a line that’s out-of-policy, prompting the manager to review carefully and either approve as an exception or deny. CFOs are very concerned with out-of-policy spend because it directly undermines cost control efforts by creating significant spend leakage. It also can be symptomatic of cultural or process issues (people ignoring rules, or perhaps policies not well communicated or unrealistic). By tracking the incidence of out-of-policy spend, finance can identify areas to improve training or adjust policies. Sometimes high exception volume means the policy might need tweaking if legitimate business needs often fall outside it. Out-of-policy spend tends to decrease significantly when an automated system is put in place, because employees are presented with the rules in real time and know exceptions will be visible to approvers.
Out-of-Pocket Expense: An expense that an employee initially pays using their own personal funds (cash or personal card) which is later reimbursed by the company. Examples include a salesperson paying for a taxi and then claiming it, or an employee buying office supplies on their personal card because they didn’t have a company card. Out-of-pocket expenses are common in businesses that don’t have corporate cards for every type of spend or where employees incur small costs in the field. Managing out-of-pocket expenses is the core of Expense Reimbursements – employees file expense reports for what they paid out-of-pocket, and the company pays them back via payroll or AP. The key considerations include ensuring these expenses are legitimate, within policy, and properly documented (receipt attached). From the employee perspective, timely reimbursement is important – slow payback can effectively make employees unwilling creditors to the company, which hurts morale. Many companies try to minimise out-of-pocket spend by providing corporate cards or centralised billing, especially for large or frequent expenses, but some out-of-pocket spend is usually inevitable (e.g., a team dinner where one person picks up the tab). A spend management tool like ProSpend makes submitting out-of-pocket claims easier (mobile capture of receipts) and automates the approval and reimbursement workflow, often allowing for faster cycle times (some aim for the next reimbursement cycle, like weekly). Additionally, out-of-pocket claims feed into the accounting just like AP invoices, to ensure the company’s financials reflect these costs properly (and any GST is reclaimed). From a control standpoint, out-of-pocket expenses still must follow policy – the system checks them just as it would vendor bills or corporate card charges. Efficiently managing out of pocket expenses keeps employees happy (they’re not out-of-pocket for long) and maintains oversight and compliance on those expenditures just as on direct company spending.
Overspend (Budget Overrun): Expenditure that exceeds the allocated budget for a particular category, project, or department. Overspend can occur when actual spending surpasses planned figures – for instance, a project team might have a $50k Q1 budget but end up spending $60k, resulting in a $10k overspend. This is a red flag in financial management because it can indicate either poor planning or lack of control/visibility during execution. Spend management tools aim to prevent overspend by providing real-time budget tracking inside the spend workflow. That means when someone is about to approve an invoice or raise a PO, they can see how it impacts their available budget – if approving would cause an overrun, the sm will warn them. CFOs hate being surprised by overspend at month-end. Embedding purchase orders and budgets in the platform addresses this: every claim, every PO, every card transaction is checked against the relevant budget in real time. If something would cause overspend, ideally it is caught before the spend happens or at least before it’s paid. If overspend does occur, analysis can determine why: unexpected price increases? Scope creep? Or just not monitoring? The spend management platform’s data helps answer that, showing spend vs. budget continuously. It also fosters accountability: budget owners see their performance and can adjust behavior. Stopping overspend is not only about avoiding negative variances on financial reports – it directly ties to a company’s ability to achieve profit targets and operational goals.

P

Payment Automation: The use of technology to streamline and execute supplier payments with minimal manual intervention. Once invoices are approved in a spend management system, payment automation takes over to actually remit funds to suppliers on the due date via methods like electronic bank transfers (ACH, EFT), BPAY (in Australia), credit card payments, or even cutting checks if needed. Instead of an AP clerk manually entering payment info into a bank portal or printing checks, the system can generate a payment batch for all due invoices, which a finance manager can then approve for disbursement. Some advanced solutions have direct integrations with banking systems or payment networks to send payments with one click (or automatically with predefined rules). Benefits of payment automation include reduced data entry errors (no re-keying bank details each time), time savings, better cash flow control (you can schedule payments precisely to due dates or to grab early discounts), and improved security (since bank details and processes are more controlled). It also provides a clear payment audit trail – you can see within the system when a payment was made and reference numbers, which simplifies supplier inquiries. Payment automation also helps with batch payments: pay multiple invoices to the same supplier in one go, or consolidate funding for a batch on a single day, etc., which optimises bank fees and cash usage. It is like the last mile of AP automation – ensuring that after all the upstream improvements, the actual payout is also handled efficiently, accurately, and on-time.
Policy Compliance (Spend Policies): Adhering to the internal rules that govern how employees can spend company money. Spend policies cover a wide range of guidelines, from travel policies (class of airfare, hotel star ratings or nightly rate caps, meal per diems), to entertainment policies (whether client entertainment is allowed and at what limits), to procurement policies (which purchases require competitive quotes, which must go through preferred suppliers, etc.), to approval policies (who must sign off at various spend levels). Ensuring policy compliance means that each expense or purchase is evaluated against these rules and either allowed, limited, or prevented.

In the past, compliance relied on manual checks and employee honesty/awareness. Modern spend management automates a lot of this: the system can be configured with the rules so that it automatically flags or blocks non-compliant actions. For example, if policy says “airfare over $1000 needs CFO approval,” an attempted booking or expense claim above that can alert or route accordingly.

Compliance also extends to tax compliance (like making sure GST is handled properly) and any industry-specific regulations (like for government grants, certain expenses might not be allowed). Good policy compliance reduces out-of-policy spend and protects the company from fraud and misuse. It also drives fairness (everyone abides by the same rules) and can protect the company legally (e.g., ensuring bribes or lavish gifts aren’t expensed if against policy/law). Achieving high compliance often requires a combination of clear communication of policies, easy-to-use systems (so following policy isn’t burdensome), and monitoring/enforcement through reporting. Spend platforms typically have compliance dashboards – showing, for instance, what percentage of expense reports had exceptions or how many POs were raised after-the-fact (policy violation). This helps management take corrective action or refine policies. Policy compliance in AP involves things like confirming a valid PO or contract is in place for bigger invoices, or making sure proper approvals were obtained. A common challenge is balancing strictness with practicality; too rigid and people find workarounds, too lenient and rules don’t matter. Thus, companies calibrate their spend policies and rely on their spend management system to implement them in a user-friendly way. When done right, policy compliance becomes part of the process – employees often don’t even notice they’re “complying,” it just happens as they use the tool. That’s the ideal: compliance by design, not by after-the-fact audit.

Procure-to-Pay: The end-to-end process of purchasing goods/services (procure) and paying for them, encompassing all steps from initial requisition through to payment to the supplier. The cycle typically includes: identifying a need, creating a Purchase Order (after approvals), sending the PO to the supplier, receiving the goods or services, receiving the supplier’s invoice, matching the invoice to the PO, then processing the invoice for payment, and finally executing the payment. A spend management platform often covers a large part of the procure-to-pay cycle (from requisition/PO to invoice to payment and ERP reconciliation). Having an integrated approach is crucial for control and efficiency: it ties together procurement (often handled by purchasing teams) and accounts payable (handled by finance) into one continuous process. For instance, once a PO is approved and issued in the system, the AP side will expect an invoice against that PO. When the invoice comes, the matching process can be mostly automated, and if everything checks out, payment is straightforward. This avoids situations where AP gets an invoice out of the blue and has to chase down who ordered it. Automation can yield massive benefits: faster cycle times, better compliance with preferred vendors, volume discounts (because spend is consolidated via the PO process), fewer errors (invoice match catches discrepancies), and improved supplier relationships (fewer payment disputes). ProSpend lets staff raise POs online with budget checks then flows them into invoice matching.
Purchase Orders (PO): Formal documents issued to a supplier to authorise a purchase, detailing what is being purchased, in what quantity, at what price, and under what terms. A PO, once accepted by the supplier, becomes a binding agreement – the supplier will deliver the items/services and the company commits to pay per the PO terms. POs are central to procurement control because they require internal approval before committing company funds. By having an approved PO, organisations ensure that spend is budgeted and authorised in advance. The PO typically has a unique number which the supplier should reference on their invoice, enabling 3-Way Matching (matching PO, invoice, and receipt). POs prevent unauthorised or impulse purchases (since someone has to approve the PO first), clarity of expectations with suppliers (price, delivery date, etc., are agreed upfront), and easier invoice processing (if an invoice matches a PO, it can be auto-approved for payment). Spend management platforms such as ProSpend make PO creation and approval much more efficient compared to legacy paper or email systems. Users can raise POs in ProSpend by typing freeform descriptions, then the PO is checked against budgets and policies (e.g., if it exceeds budget or if that type of purchase needs higher approval). Approvers get notified and can approve with one click. Once approved, the PO can be sent to the supplier electronically. The system then waits for an invoice against that PO. In many mid-market companies, implementing a PO system is a game-changer: it brings a level of discipline and foresight to spending that may have been lacking. Instead of discovering unapproved spend after the fact, management approves it beforehand. From the CFO’s perspective, robust PO usage means far fewer surprise invoices and easier accruals and cash planning, since outstanding POs forecast future spend. Suppliers also appreciate POs because it assures them the order is legitimate and they’ll get paid accordingly.

Q

Quality Control (AP Data Checks): In accounts payable, this refers to the internal checks and validations that ensure the accuracy and integrity of invoice processing. While “quality control” is a broad term, in AP it manifests as validations like: verifying invoice totals and line items add up (no calculation errors), ensuring the supplier details on an invoice match a known vendor in the system (to catch typos or fraudulent changes), and confirming data consistency (e.g., the PO number on the invoice is valid and open). Many of these quality control checks are automated in modern systems. For example, when an invoice is scanned, the system might automatically flag if an invoice number is a duplicate of one already processed (preventing double payment) – that’s a quality control to avoid errors. Quality control also includes verifying that all required fields are present (invoice date, supplier ABN, etc., on Australian tax invoices – if something like ABN is missing, that invoice might not be a valid tax invoice). In spend management platforms, many of these validations happen instantly as data is captured. System-enforced business rules contribute to quality: like not allowing an invoice to be approved if key info is missing, or if coding is incomplete. In a manual environment, AP clerks had checklists and heavy reliance on personal diligence for quality control; with automation, the system does a lot (though AP staff still review exceptions and overall processing). This improves consistency: every invoice goes through the same gauntlet of checks. It reduces the risk of paying wrong amounts or having to later adjust entries. ProSpend’s multi-check fraud control process is a form of quality check – verifying bank details, supplier averages, etc., to ensure a payment isn’t erroneous or risky.
Questionable Expenses: Expense claims that appear potentially improper, ineligible, or fraudulent – essentially, they raise a question about whether they should be reimbursed. Examples might include personal expenses submitted as business (like a claim for a spouse’s meal), unusually high amounts for a given expense type (a \$500 taxi ride), expenses at odd times or locations (like hotel charges in the city where the employee works, which might suggest it’s not a business trip), or repetitive claims that look like splits to avoid policy limits. Spend management systems help flag questionable expenses automatically using rules and AI. For instance, any expense without a receipt above a certain amount might be flagged, or entertainment expenses with high costs might require extra justification. The system may label these as “exceptions” or “policy violations,” but effectively they are questionable and need a closer look. When an expense is flagged, it usually goes up the chain for a higher-level approval or audit. This fosters a culture where employees know out-of-policy or odd claims will be scrutinised. It also provides data to refine policies; if certain questionable expenses keep popping up, maybe the policy needs to be clarified or tightened.
QuickBooks Integration: Connecting a spend management platform with QuickBooks, a widely used accounting software, particularly common among small and mid-sized businesses. QuickBooks Online manages the general ledger, financial reporting, and basic AP/AR for many companies. An integration allows spend data (approved bills, expenses) to flow from the spend management tool into QuickBooks without manual entry. Many mid-market companies in ANZ use QuickBooks Online (especially if they have US ties or started small and grew). ProSpend’s integration with QuickBooks means the finance team can rely on real-time data: the moment something is final in ProSpend, it’s in QuickBooks contributing to cash requirements and financial statements. It also means month-end is smoother – no backlog of expenses waiting to be journaled in. QuickBooks integration combines ProSpend’s spend control with QuickBooks’ accounting in a seamless way. For a QuickBooks-centric finance team, this would drastically cut down manual AP data entry and reconciliation, ensuring the books reflect reality with minimal lag.
Quick Ratio (Acid-Test Ratio): A liquidity metric that measures a company’s ability to pay its short-term obligations with its most liquid assets. The formula is usually (Current Assets – Inventory) / Current Liabilities. It’s called the “quick” or “acid-test” ratio because it looks at assets that can be quickly converted to cash (such as cash itself, marketable securities, and accounts receivable) and excludes inventory which might take time to sell. Quick Ratio is influenced by how the company manages payables (part of current liabilities) and receivables/cash. Efficient spend management can indirectly improve the quick ratio by optimising the timing of outflows: for example, by extending payables (within reason and terms) or by reducing unnecessary cash outflows (like avoiding late payment fees or capturing early payment discounts which bolster cash). Also, accurate handling of payables ensures current liabilities on the balance sheet are correctly stated – an automated system ensures all approved but unpaid invoices are recorded (some companies that are behind on AP might under-report current liabilities, which would make quick ratio look artificially better; an accurate number is crucial for analysis). A high quick ratio (well above 1) suggests strong liquidity – the company can cover its liabilities even if no further cash comes in. A low quick ratio (below 1) could be a warning sign of potential cash crunch. Finance teams track this, and improvements in AP processes can help by preventing cash being unnecessarily tied up. For instance, if the quick ratio is low, a CFO might emphasise maximising payment terms (thus, at the snapshot of a month-end, liabilities are lower relative to cash because you’re not paying earlier than needed). Conversely, if the quick ratio is healthy, maybe the company can afford to pay early to take a discount. A strong spend process that avoids surprises and last-minute urgent payments tends to help maintain a stable quick ratio. By eliminating leakage (like duplicate payments or fraud), the company retains more cash, which helps current assets side of the ratio.

R

Receipt Management: The process of collecting, storing, and validating receipts for business expenses. In the context of T&E (travel & entertainment) and employee reimbursements, managing receipts is crucial for compliance (tax and policy) and for audit support. Receipt management traditionally was a pain: employees hoarded paper receipts in wallets or envelopes, then taped them to pages or scanned them for expense reports; finance teams then had to archive these and retrieve them during audits or FBT calculations. Modern spend management tools like ProSpend make receipt management almost effortless: employees can snap a photo of a receipt with a mobile app right at the point of purchase, or email electronic receipts to a designated address. The system uses OCR to read the receipt and auto-fill the expense details, attaching the image to the expense entry. This means no lost receipts, and clear records. For corporate card purchases, receipt management ensures that each card transaction is substantiated: the employee will see card charges in the system and can attach corresponding receipts or explain if receipt is unavailable. Receipt images are stored in the cloud linked to the expense reports, so come audit time, an auditor can be given read-only access or finance can quickly pull up all receipts in a date range or for a certain category. This is far superior to digging through file cabinets of paper. Once receipts are digitised, tax compliance is easier – to claim GST input credits with reports that can be produced for the tax office if needed. FBT calculations often need details from receipts (like names of people at a meal) and modern systems capture that info along with the receipt image through structured forms, producing reports that satisfy FBT record-keeping requirements. A robust receipt management process is a key reason companies can confidently go paperless in AP and T&E.
Reimbursements (Employee Reimbursements): The process of paying back employees for out-of-pocket expenses they incurred on behalf of the company. Common reimbursable expenses include travel costs (flights, hotels, meals), mileage on personal vehicles for work trips, small office supplies bought in a pinch, client entertainment paid personally, etc. The reimbursement workflow typically involves the employee submitting an expense report with details of each expense, attaching receipts, and specifying business purpose and categories. This then goes through an approval flow – usually the employee’s manager, and sometimes finance or higher if amounts are large or exceptions are present. Once approved, the expense report goes to finance for payment. Payments could be via payroll (added to the next paycheck) or through Accounts Payable (as an EFT to the employee’s bank account). Efficient reimbursement systems, like ProSpend aim to make this cycle as quick and painless as possible so that employees aren’t out-of-pocket for long. Timely reimbursement is important for morale; it signals the company respects employees’ personal cash flow. CFOs also want accurate and policy-adherent reimbursement – making sure only legitimate expenses are reimbursed and that they’re recorded properly. With a unified spend platform, reimbursements are handled alongside other spend: the data is captured for budgeting and analysis, and it's clear how much each department is spending via reimbursements versus corporate cards or AP invoices. Many companies have moved to corporate cards for frequent travelers to reduce the burden of reimbursements, but reimbursements will never go away entirely. Thus, streamlining them is key. This includes mobile submission (so an employee can submit expenses on the fly rather than procrastinate) and automatic currency conversion for international expenses. Also, recurring mileage or per diem can be automated: e.g., ProSpend lets employees log mileage entries via Google Maps integration and apply the standard rate, simplifying those reimbursements. Reimbursement data also feeds into spend analysis – e.g., seeing total travel spend inclusive of both corporate card charges and reimbursed cash expenses. ProSpend ensures a smooth reimbursement process which keeps employees engaged and willing to incur necessary expenses for work without worry, and also lets companies move to Virtual Cards to enable employees to access company funds while keeping spend controls in place.
Reporting & Analytics: This refers to the tools and outputs that allow finance teams and management to understand spending patterns, compliance, and performance against various metrics. Good reporting answers questions like: How much did we spend on travel this quarter? Which departments are over or under budget? Who are our top vendors and are we concentrating too much spend in one? How quickly are invoices being processed and paid? Where are the bottlenecks? Analytics might delve deeper, identifying trends (e.g., spend by category over time), anomalies (flagging an unusually high expense in a category), or opportunities (like noticing consistently that one supplier’s prices are creeping up faster than others, signaling a need to renegotiate). Modern spend management systems such as ProSpend typically come with dashboards and standard report sets. A dashboard might show Spend vs Budget in real-time for each department head, so they can self-serve and see how they’re tracking. Another common report is Aging of Payables – how much AP is due in various time buckets, which is crucial for cash planning. Analytics can also focus on process efficiency: e.g., an AP Efficiency report might measure the average invoice approval time, percentage of straight-through processing invoices, or the number of invoices processed per AP staff per month. These metrics help demonstrate the value of automation or highlight areas to improve. Integrated analytics might correlate data – e.g., linking spend data with outcomes: if a company tracks project spend and project revenue, analytics might show project profitability in near real-time (if the system is used to tag expenses to projects).Reporting is also essential for compliance: generating audit-ready reports such as an FBT report or a GST report with all necessary details for tax filings.
Return on Investment (ROI): ROI refers to the financial return or benefits gained relative to the cost of implementing a new spend management system. The ROI can come from direct cost savings, efficiency gains, and risk reduction. For example, benefits contributing to ROI include: eliminating late payment fees (saving hard dollars), capturing early payment discounts, reducing manual labor (AP staff can handle more volume or the company avoids hiring extra headcount as it grows), preventing duplicate payments or fraud losses, recovering more GST input tax credits (because of better receipt tracking and compliance), avoiding or deferring adding FTEs by increasing productivity and even things like improving vendor pricing through consolidated spend visibility.

S

Spend Analysis: The practice of reviewing and analysing company expenditure data to identify patterns, trends, and opportunities for cost savings or efficiency improvements. Spend analysis can be performed by category (how much is spent on IT, travel, office supplies, etc.), by supplier (total spend per vendor to inform negotiations or consolidation efforts), by department or project, or other dimensions. With a unified spend platform, a lot of spend data that was previously scattered (AP invoices, corporate card transactions, reimbursements) is centralised and categorised, making spend analysis far easier and more accurate. Many CFOs want to transition their teams from simply processing transactions to providing analysis that informs business strategy. Spend analysis also feeds into budgeting – understanding last year’s spend composition helps build this year’s budget realistically. With ProSpend, much of the heavy lifting (data gathering, categorisation) is done at entry, so analysis is a matter of running reports, not collating spreadsheets. Spend analysis turns raw spending data into actionable intelligence on cost reduction, supplier management, and budgeting. It ensures that spend visibility translates into spend value: once you see where the money is going, you can optimise it.
Spend Leakage: Money spent that does not add value or is wasted, often due to inefficiencies, errors, or non-compliance. It’s essentially the “leaks” in the company’s spending where cash drips out unnecessarily. Examples of spend leakage include duplicate payments (paying the same invoice twice), late fees, unused subscriptions or services, overpaying for something due to lack of negotiation or using non-preferred vendors, expense fraud or out-of-policy expenses reimbursed, and paying for things that weren’t received or weren’t needed. Spend leakage is often not immediately obvious; it accumulates in the background when robust controls and analyses are absent. A few hundred dollars in late fees here, a few thousand on untracked small purchases there, some unnoticed billing errors elsewhere – over a year these can sum to a significant amount. With full spend visibility, finance can analyse and find leakages like multiple departments unknowingly buying the same software on separate credit cards (could consolidate licenses), or paying for overnight shipping routinely when not necessary, etc. Stopping spend leakage is often the quickest ROI in adopting spend management – it’s relatively “low-hanging fruit” since you’re eliminating pure waste. For example, just eliminating duplicate payments and the majority of late fees can immediately save a chunk that may cover the system’s cost.
Spend Management Platform (also Unified Spend Management Platform): A comprehensive software solution that unifies and automates the processes of controlling and tracking all business spending. A spend management platform like ProSpend typically encompasses modules for accounts payable (invoice automation), expense management (employee reimbursements and corporate card spend), purchase orders and procurement, and often budgets and reporting - bringing expenses, AP, virtual cards and budgets together in one workflow. The platform serves as a single system of record and process for any outgoing money aside from payroll. Key features include digitising input (OCR for invoices, mobile app for receipts), enforcing approval workflows and spend policies (so that no spend happens without proper authorisation), providing real-time visibility into all company expenditures and offering analysis tools. The platform approach contrasts with having siloed tools (one for travel expenses, another for AP, etc.) – silos create blind spots and duplicative effort. By consolidating onto one platform, organisations can eliminate those gaps where spend could hide and slip through without scrutiny. It also improves efficiency: users have one interface to submit or approve any type of spend, and finance has one system to administer. Integration is a hallmark too – a good spend platform plugs into the ERP so that all approved spend data flows to accounting seamlessly. A spend management platform aligns finance and procurement goals with everyday operations, embedding accountability into each transaction. Companies adopting such platforms often see benefits like cost savings, improved productivity (no more paper shuffling), and better decision-making due to data availability. It’s akin to moving from analog, fragmented processes to a unified digital command center for all non-payroll spend. A platform like ProSpend not only catches problems (fraud, errors, overspend) but also empowers proactive control and brings efficiencies and savings.
Spend Visibility: The degree to which an organisation can see and understand its spending in a timely, detailed manner. High spend visibility means that at any given moment, management knows how much has been spent, on what, by whom, and how that compares to budgets or forecasts. It also implies the ability to slice and dice spend data by category, supplier, project, etc. Spend visibility is a key benefit delivered by a spend management platform like ProSpend – by processing all spend through one system, you generate a complete and real-time picture of expenditures. For example, rather than waiting until weeks after month-end to see what was spent (when financial reports are issued), a CFO or department head could log into a dashboard today and see spend year-to-date versus budget for their department. Real-time spend visibility can prevent budget overruns because managers see commitments and actuals as they happen and can course-correct. It also aids cash flow planning, as AP knows what’s in the pipeline. Achieving true spend visibility is hard without an integrated system; if invoices are in one database, expense reports in another, and purchase commitments perhaps not tracked at all, the full picture is elusive. A spend management platform cures that by consolidating spend data and presenting it in digestible formats. For finance, it means no more end-of-quarter scramble discovering invoices that blow the budget, because everything was visible along the way. The result of enhanced spend visibility is more informed decision-making, timely interventions to avoid problems, and overall greater confidence in financial management.
Supplier Management: The process of systematically managing vendor information, relationships, and performance. Supplier management often involves maintaining a centralized supplier database with all relevant details (contact info, bank details, tax IDs, contracts, agreed terms), and linking that to transactions. A big part of supplier management in a platform like ProSpend is ensuring the supplier master data is accurate and up-to-date, since things like fraud control rely on it (e.g., verifying an invoice’s bank account against the master record to avoid fraud[34]). Good supplier management means each supplier is set up once and used consistently across POs and invoices – preventing duplicate vendor entries (which could lead to duplicate payments or confusion). It also covers onboarding processes: e.g., requiring new suppliers to provide necessary documentation (maybe a W-9 form in US or ABN in Australia, insurance certs, etc.) before they are approved in the system – sometimes integrated with KYS (Know Your Supplier) steps. Another aspect is tracking performance: noting issues like late deliveries, quality problems, or conversely, noting if a supplier offers early pay discounts or has been stable. Some systems allow recording performance reviews or ratings for each supplier. Spend management systems sometimes have supplier self-service portals as well, where vendors can submit invoices directly, track payment status, or update their info (subject to approval) – this streamlines communication and reduces AP queries (“When will I be paid?”). ProSpend’s approach includes an “integrated supplier database” to effectively manage supplier records and keep them in sync[53]. This likely means when a supplier changes something (like their address or banking), it can be updated in your ERP, synced to ProSpend and reflected in all future transactions. Efficient supplier management reduces errors (paying the wrong account), speeds up processing (if all info is correct and readily available, invoice matching is easier), and supports strategic sourcing (by analysing how much you spend per supplier, finance can work with procurement to negotiate volume discounts or cull redundant suppliers). Additionally, linking POs and contracts to suppliers in the system means when an invoice comes, the system can automatically check if that supplier invoice should reference a PO or contract (and flag if not). Supplier management also includes risk aspects: monitoring supplier health or having contingency suppliers for critical categories. While that may be beyond the software’s main scope, the data from the system (like heavy reliance on one supplier) can inform those risk strategies. In summary, supplier management in the spend management context is about maintaining good data and oversight of vendors, which leads to smoother transactions, better control (through features like blocked lists or approved supplier lists for certain categories), and stronger relationships (paying on time, less disputes). By having “one reliable place” for supplier data[53], companies avoid the chaos of spreadsheets or decentralized records and ensure every transaction with suppliers is backed by correct, vetted information.

T

Three-Way Matching: A process in accounts payable to verify that a supplier’s invoice is legitimate and accurate by comparing three documents: the Purchase Order (PO), the Goods Receipt/Service Receipt (confirmation of goods or services received), and the Invoice. The PO outlines what was ordered and at what price, the receipt (often a packing slip or system entry) confirms what the company actually received (and in what quantity/quality), and the invoice is what the supplier is billing. In a three-way match, the AP system checks that the details (item, quantity, and price) on the invoice match both the PO and the receipt. If all three align within acceptable tolerance, it signals that: the company ordered it, got it, and is being charged correctly – thus the invoice can be approved for payment automatically or with minimal review. Three-way matching is one of the strongest controls to prevent overpaying or paying for something not received. It’s a core feature of spend management/AP automation systems. A two-way match is a simpler form that matches just the invoice to the PO (suitable if physical receipt tracking isn’t available or needed). 3-way matching not only prevents fraud/errors but also speeds up processing: invoices that match can be auto-approved (touchless). Only exceptions need manual intervention, which, according to best practices, should be a small percentage if upstream processes are good. Three-way matching works best in organisations with disciplined purchasing via POs and receiving. For service-oriented or intangible purchases, sometimes a formal “receipt” is a signed-off completion or timesheet – which can still be used for matching conceptually. Three-way match is a gold-standard AP control automated by spend systems: it reduces maverick spend (because no PO means no automatic payment), ensures you only pay for what you got at agreed terms, and protects against fraud.
Travel Expense Management: The subset of expense management dealing with travel-related expenses – flights, hotels, meals, ground transportation, etc., usually governed by a corporate travel policy. It often involves not just reimbursing employees but also integrating with corporate travel booking systems or credit card feeds. Travel expense management solutions help reconcile travel within policy, capture e-receipts from airlines or hotels, and simplify submitting those expenses.ProSpend has a Travel Manager module that auto-matches trip data to expenses – daily trip feeds auto-match receipts and code travel claims, eliminating back-from-travel paperwork. ProSpend covers travel expense management by syncing itinerary info and corporate card charges to produce a near-automatic expense report for trips. Good travel expense management results in quicker reconciliation – for instance, when an employee returns from a trip, all their corporate card charges from that trip might already be grouped and matched with receipts in the system, ready for them to submit with one click. It also tracks items like daily meal limits or per diems if using those. And importantly, it collects data necessary for FBT on entertainment if travel included client dinners, etc., by prompting for attendee info. Travel often generates one of the highest volumes of expense transactions, hence specialised focus.If an employee books through a designated travel tool, those booking details can feed into ProSpend so the employee doesn’t have to re-enter any data. ProSpend’s ability to automate travel reconciliation solves a key pain point. It alleviates the Friday afternoon ritual of “hunting for missing dockets” after trips and helps prevent leakage in travel (like reclaimable GST on international travel).

U

Unified Platform: A unified spend management platform means one solution that covers the entire spectrum of business spend – from raising purchase requests to paying invoices to managing employee expenses and corporate cards – rather than using different siloed systems for each. The advantage of a unified platform is centralized data and consistent user experience. For example, ProSpend is an all-in-one spend management platform (unifying AP, expenses, cards, budgets under one login). For the user (employees, approvers), this simplifies things – they go to one place to handle any spend-related task (approving an invoice, requesting a PO, submitting an expense, etc.), rather than juggling multiple tools. For the organisation, it means one source of truth for spend data and easier maintenance (one vendor, one integration to ERP, etc.). A unified platform often also enables cross-module intelligence: budgets and actuals are all tracked in the same system, so if someone tries to spend over budget, the system knows in real time (because budgets, POs, and invoices are all modules within the unified platform). This enables risk reduction in terms of data consistency and security (less points of failure or data transfer). It also addresses change management – easier to train users on one system vs. many. Many companies end up with fragmented solutions due to historical purchase of different tools for travel, a local AP system for invoices, etc. But now the market is geared toward unified spend solutions. A unified platform connects not just internal modules, but also stakeholders – some allow suppliers and employees to interact on the same platform (supplier portal for invoices, employee portal for expenses) which fosters end-to-end visibility and collaboration.
Unbudgeted Spend: Expenditures that were not planned for or included in the company’s budget. These are the surprises that CFOs dread – costs coming in that had no allocation, which can throw off financial plans and require pulling funds from elsewhere. Unbudgeted spend can occur due to emergency needs (e.g., unexpected repairs), scope creep in projects, or simply poor planning/oversight where someone made purchases without checking budget availability. Systems like ProSpend show real-time budget impact when raising a request – so a manager can see “if I approve this, my budget leftover will be only X,” thus making informed decisions. Unbudgeted spend often indicates either something fell through the cracks or someone went rogue. Frequent unbudgeted spend in a category might mean next year’s budget needs to account for that type of expense properly. Controlling unbudgeted spend requires both process (everyone knows they can’t just spend without budgeting) and tools (the system flags if no budget exists for something). CFOs strive to eliminate or at least minimise unbudgeted spend through better planning and rigorous approval processes with budget visibility. A unified spend platform like ProSpend ends month-end surprises by ensuring nearly all spend is accounted for in budgets and if not, it’s surfaced clearly. The result is more predictable financial outcomes and trust in the organisation’s financial discipline.
User Adoption: The degree to which employees (and other stakeholders like approvers, managers) actually use a new system or process as intended. High user adoption means the majority of users are engaging with the system properly and consistently; low adoption means many are bypassing it or using workarounds. For spend management tools like ProSpend, user adoption is critical because if people don’t use the system (e.g., continue doing shadow processes or find ways to spend off-system), then the company loses the control and visibility benefits. High adoption is achieved by making the system user-friendly and mobile-ready. This is crucial for realising the platform’s full value – even the best system provides no benefit if people circumvent it. When implementing a new finance tool, change management focuses a lot on user adoption strategies: simplify processes, start small , provide training, gather feedback, and continuously improve the user experience. A successfully adopted spend platform becomes part of the company culture for spending – it’s just “how things are done,” which leads to sustained compliance and data capture.
User Permissions (Role-Based Controls): The configurable settings in a spend management system that determine what each user can see and do based on their role or authority.Robust user permissions are vital to enforce segregation of duties and policy. For example, an AP clerk might have permission to upload invoices but not to approve them; a department manager can approve expenses for their team but not for other departments; a CFO might have visibility across the whole system and can approve high-value items that exceed managers’ limits. Role-based controls ensure that sensitive functions (like editing vendor bank details, or exporting payment files) are only accessible to authorised personnel, which is a major fraud prevention measure. The system might have predefined roles (e.g., requester, approver, AP admin, auditor) and also allow custom ones. Permissions typically cover two aspects: access to data (who can view what – e.g., an employee likely should only see their own expense reports and maybe their subordinates’ if they’re a manager; they shouldn’t see other teams’ invoices) and ability to take actions (initiate a request, approve, reject, edit, etc.). By aligning permissions with job responsibilities, the spend platform ensures one user cannot unilaterally complete an entire transaction loop (for instance, one person shouldn’t be able to request and approve their own high-value spend – the system will route it to someone higher). In multi-entity setups, permissions restrict users to their entity’s data. CFOs and auditors care about this because it ties to compliance and auditability – every action is done by the appropriate person and there’s a record (approval flows show who did what). User Permissions guarantee that the spend management process follows the principle of least privilege: users only have the access needed to perform their duties. This safeguards against errors or intentional misuse (someone with no approver authority cannot accidentally approve something, etc.) and keeps confidential information restricted. A truly effective spend management system like ProSpend provides fine-grained and configurable permissions to mirror the company’s delegation of authority and organisational structure.

V

Virtual Cards: Virtual cards are digital-only payment card numbers (usually Mastercard/Visa) that can be issued instantly for specific purchases or to specific employees, often with defined spend limits and controls. Unlike physical corporate cards, virtual cards exist electronically (you might use it by typing the card number into an online purchase form or adding to a mobile wallet). They are typically one-time use or limited-time use, which makes them great for controlling spend – for example, a department head could generate a virtual card with a $500 limit only valid for the next 30 days at a certain supplier. Virtual cards have become popular for managing subscriptions, online purchases, or in scenarios where you want to avoid sharing the main corporate card number broadly. Because they can be closed or capped easily, the risk of fraud or overcharge is minimised. ProSpend offers an ability to issue virtual cards on the fly, integrated in its platform. With these cards, spend becomes more controlled and visible (each virtual card could be tied to a person or a project and appears in the system with real-time transactions). It also solves the headache of employees using personal cards for company purchases: instead, the finance team can just send them a virtual card for a specific need. Employees get the flexibility to make necessary purchases quickly (not waiting for procurement for every small thing) but finance retains oversight and limits. Virtual cards can enforce category or merchant restrictions at the network level. They also can be issued and canceled immediately, solving logistical issues of physical card distribution. Virtual cards typically integrate with accounts – e.g., drawing from the company credit facility or pre-funded account. The system might allow setting up virtual cards for a specific vendor – for instance, one card number per subscription service, so it’s easy to kill that subscription by canceling the card if needed. With solutions like ProSpend issuing virtual cards in seconds, organisations can dramatically reduce the need for reimbursements and the risk of uncontrolled personal card use.
Vendor Bank Verification: A fraud prevention step where the company validates that the bank account details provided by a supplier for payment belong to that supplier or match expected records. This is critical because a common fraud is invoice interception or spoofing where bank details are changed to divert payments. Tools like ProSpend have built-in checks – e.g., cross-referencing the invoice’s BSB/account or IBAN with what’s on file for that vendor. If it doesn’t match, that invoice can be flagged for fraud review.Periodic verification might also be done if a supplier changes bank accounts – requiring someone in AP to confirm via an independent channel. Vendor bank verification might also involve verifying that the bank account name matches the supplier’s legal name (some countries have confirmation of payee systems). Vendor bank verification is a specific but crucial control in accounts payable – it’s the gatekeeper making sure when you issue a payment, it indeed goes to the intended beneficiary.

W

Wasteful Spend: Expenditures that do not generate commensurate value or could have been avoided without negatively affecting operations. This can overlap with spend leakage but also includes inefficiencies like overpaying suppliers, unused services, excess inventory purchases that go obsolete, etc. It’s essentially any spending that could be cut without harming the business’s ability to function and meet goals. A lot of wasteful spend can hide in maverick spend or lack of controls – when employees don’t follow procurement policies, they might pay higher prices than negotiated (that extra cost is waste), or use a non-approved vendor who isn’t as cost-effective. Spend analysis helps uncover waste by highlighting unusual patterns (like one team spends 2x on printing compared to others – maybe they aren’t using the preferred print vendor contract). A spend management platform like ProSpend contributes to cutting wasteful spend by ensuring compliance (stopping those overpriced or unneeded purchases proactively) and by providing data to identify inefficiencies (like noticing a subscription unused for 3 months – time to cancel!).
Workflow Automation: In spend management, this refers to the automation of processes that move a task through a sequence of steps or approvals without manual intervention. For instance, invoice approval workflow automation means once an invoice is entered, the system automatically routes it to the appropriate manager(s) based on predefined rules (like department or amount thresholds), sends reminders, and upon approval, moves it to the next step (maybe matching or ready for payment). No one has to print it or email it around; the system handles the flow. Similarly, expense report workflow: employee submits, it goes to their manager, then maybe finance, then to payment queued – all tracked in the system. Workflow automation with a tool like ProSpend saves time (less waiting or items lost in inboxes), ensures consistency (every invoice goes through proper checks), and provides transparency (one can see where in the workflow something is pending via the system’s status). It also allows conditional logic (like if >$10k also include CFO). Another advantage: audit trail – each step is logged. Many CFOs insist on strong workflows because emails and spreadsheets lack that control. Workflow Automation in spend management means invoices, purchase requests, and expense claims flow to the right people and systems for review and recording with little human admin. This ensures policy compliance and speeds up the procure-to-pay cycle. Good workflow automation is also adaptable – e.g., if someone’s out of office, delegation approver rules can be set up in ProSpend to auto-forward approvals to their backup.
Working Capital Management: The practice of managing short-term assets and liabilities to ensure a company has sufficient liquidity to carry out operations, while also optimising efficiency. Working capital = current assets minus current liabilities. AP and spend management directly tie into working capital: by managing the outflow of cash (through payables timing, see Days Payable Outstanding and Just-in-Time Payments), a company can increase its working capital (holding onto cash longer) or decrease it (pay faster to take discounts or build supplier goodwill). It’s a strategic lever: if a company wants to free up cash, it may extend payment terms or slow some disbursements (within reason); if flush with cash and wanting to reduce costs, it might pay early for discounts or invest in inventory, etc., thus decreasing net working capital perhaps but improving profitability or relationships. Spend management tools such as ProSpend help by providing clear visibility of all current obligations (so the treasury knows how much cash is needed when), and by allowing fine control of payment timing (so you can align outflows with inflows and avoid shortfalls). By integrating with procurement, a spend system can avoid over-ordering inventory (Procurement and AP link to ensure purchases align with actual needs, helping inventory not balloon – that’s indirect but relevant). A well-managed payables process (with full visibility and control via the spend management platform) means the company can confidently negotiate terms and time payments to optimise its working capital (maintain enough cash but not let it sit idle). It ensures the company can fund its day-to-day operations efficiently. Good working capital management leads to possibly not needing to draw on expensive credit lines or being able to invest cash short-term.

X

Xero Integration: Connecting a spend management platform with Xero, a very popular cloud accounting software, especially among small and mid-sized businesses worldwide (particularly in Australia/New Zealand and UK). A Xero integration ensures that all the spend-related transactions (bills, expense claims, etc.) from the spend system flow into Xero automatically, keeping the general ledger up to date. ProSpend provides an integration with Xero. With this integration, when an invoice is approved in ProSpend, it could create a corresponding draft or approved bill in Xero, coded to the right accounts and tracking categories and attaching the image. Similarly, expense reports once processed could either push individual spend transactions to Xero or aggregate. The integration typically involves an API – meaning data sync is fairly real-time or triggered at intervals. Benefits: no double data entry (AP doesn’t have to manually enter bills into Xero), reduced errors, and timely financial records. Many mid-market companies either start on Xero before moving to larger ERPs or stick with Xero up to quite a size – so having a spend management solution that integrates lets them add AP automation while keeping Xero as the finance system of record. This ensures the company’s Xero general ledger reflects the latest spend data without manual effort, and that the spend system is aware of key financial data (like accounts or vendor lists).

Y

Year-End Close: Similar to month-end close but for the fiscal year’s final period. It often involves additional tasks like auditing, ensuring all accruals for the year are posted, perhaps rolling over balances to the new fiscal year, preparing comprehensive financial statements, and sometimes complying with external audit and tax reporting. In spend management context, year-end is when finance double-checks that all expenses and payables relating to that year have been captured (cut-off testing). A spend management system such as ProSpend assists by giving a clear picture of all pending invoices and unsubmitted expenses as of year-end, so finance can accrue appropriately for any that belong in that year but haven’t been processed fully. Also, budgets typically operate on annual cycles, so year-end is time to see how departments performed vs. budget and reset new budgets (some systems help carry over or reset budgets, or provide analytics on last year’s spend to inform next year’s planning). Year-end may also mean dealing with things like an influx of expenses as employees hurry to submit before cut-off, or vendors sending invoices in early July that relate to June – the AP system makes sure they get recorded in the right period. ProSpend helps to ensure all spending is accounted for properly and no surprises pop up after the books are closed. It makes providing auditors with documentation (invoices, receipts) easier too – all stored and searchable, saving time in the audit process.
Year-to-Date (YTD) Spend: The cumulative amount of money spent from the beginning of the fiscal year up to the current date (or up to a specific cutoff). YTD figures are commonly referenced in management reports to see progress towards budget or vs. prior year. A spend management tool like ProSpend provides real-time YTD spend figures at various levels (company, department, project), so budget owners always know where they stand mid-year. YTD spend being readily visible as opposed to waiting for periodic reports is a big improvement in dynamic budgeting and accountability. This clearly ties into budgets and visibility themes, and is a relatively simple concept but quite often referenced. So including it helps illustrate the analytical capability of the platform.
Yearly Budgeting (Annual Planning Cycle): The process done typically in the months leading up to a new fiscal year where finance, in collaboration with department heads, sets the budget for each part of the organisation for the upcoming year. It involves reviewing last year’s spend (hence relying on good data from the spend management system, perhaps doing spend analysis reports by category/department) and forecasting changes (growth initiatives, cost saving targets, etc.). A robust spend management system like ProSpend can inform this process significantly: with all spend categorised and visible, managers can easily pull reports of their last 12 months spend to propose next year’s. It can also highlight areas to cut (maybe they see some category that was high but not critical – they target reduction).ProSpend has a budgets module that helps set budget amounts by project and track actuals vs budget. It allows carrying forward unused budget or requesting budget adjustments (some solutions have a workflow for budget change requests). Annual budgeting is a heavy exercise – CFOs use historical spend data (extracted often by GL accounts from accounting systems) – but if the spend platform categories align to GL, that data is accessible. Even better, it can produce analytics like “how much of last year’s budget was not used” – which might influence cutting or reallocating budgets (if a department consistently underspends, maybe their budget was too high, or one that overspent might need more or enforcement). CFOs often shorten the budgeting cycle by leveraging spend analytics – what used to take months of consolidating spreadsheets can be informed quickly by pulling last year’s spend breakdown from the system. And after budgets are set, uploading them into the spend platform makes them actionable (with warnings or stops when someone tries to exceed).

Z

Zero-Based Budgeting (ZBB): A budgeting method where each new budget period’s spending is built from scratch (“zero base”), rather than taking last year’s budget as a baseline and adjusting. This means every expense must be justified for that period as if it were new, rather than justifying only the changes. ZBB is used to eliminate ingrained assumptions and potentially find significant cost savings, because it doesn’t assume that any cost is automatically needed again – everything must earn its place in the budget. It’s a more labor-intensive process, but can flush out waste and redundant activities. A spend management solution can assist ZBB by providing granular detail of what was actually spent and on what – so managers can examine each category and decide if it’s needed or can be cut. With a finance system capturing business spend by purpose, it is easier to question each area. If ZBB identifies a cost to cut (say office snacks), the CFO can physically remove that budget from the system – so any attempt to spend on that triggers a denial because no budget exists now. ZBB basically sets some budgets to zero to force re-justification of each spend item. ProSpend gives finance teams the detailed insights needed to implement ZBB – managers can review all line items of past spend and decide which ones to include in the new budget and which to eliminate as unnecessary. CFOs in cost-cutting modes often use ZBB to reset spending culture, and a robust spend visibility and control system is critical to make that feasible because they can then monitor that those 'zero or minimal budgets' are respected in practice.
Zero-Touch Processing (Touchless AP): It refers to an ideal state in accounts payable where an invoice can go from receipt to payment without any human handling – fully automated processing. “Zero touch” implies that once the invoice enters the system (via e-Invoice or OCR), everything is handled by rules: data is captured automatically, matched to PO and receiving, approved by preset logic or minor exceptions, coded and sent to ERP, and scheduled for payment – all without an AP clerk needing to intervene.
Achieving zero-touch is the pinnacle of AP efficiency and many AP departments measure what % of invoices are touchless. Typically routine invoices (correct, matching POs, or within thresholds) can be auto-approved. The benefit is huge: AP staff only spend time on the exceptions that truly need judgment or supplier communication, drastically increasing throughput. CFOs like this because it not only cuts labor costs or lets the team handle more volume, but also reduces errors (less manual involvement means fewer typos). It also speeds up cycle time so they can possibly secure early pay discounts or close accruals faster. A near zero-touch process also means scalability – you can double invoice volume without doubling staff. In AP, this means invoices are received, captured, matched, approved, and posted without anyone manually reviewing or entering data. Spend management solutions such as ProSpend strive for this by using AI, rules, and integrations – e.g., if an invoice exactly matches an approved PO and goods receipt, the system can auto-approve it for payment. Achieving zero-touch on as many transactions as possible allows the AP team to focus only on problematic invoices and strategic tasks rather than clerical ones. It’s the ultimate efficiency goal and a key ROI driver.

One Unified Platform for spend management and proactive control

Expense Manager

AP Manager

Spend Control

Business Spend Management & Finance Automation Glossary

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

J

K

L

M

N

O

P

Q

R

S

T

U

V

W

X

Y

Z